What I suspect therefore is that this is a “pseudo fork” as Eric Raymond referred to in The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Breaking off from even few plugins doesn’t seem like a strong move.
Mozilla’s best features have always been it’s available add-ons and almost every discussion about Pale Moon seems to center around whether it works with X add-on that someone loves. Why you would fork a browser that already has good performance?ģ. Gecko was at or near the top of a variety of speed tests out there.
#Pale moon mtg code#
Building and maintaining an engine, even from a mature code base like Gecko, seems a monumental effort.Ģ.
Nevermind the documentation, community input, and testing that are necessary. Javascript performance, support for HTML 5, the Acid test, CSS, cross-platform compatibility, and a VERY long list of other issues all affect how a given engine is received. Browser engines are complex things that take a lot of time and energy. Just deal with it haters, Pale Moon is a great browser.ġ. I have 15 extensions running and they work with no issues, if in the future they stop working I will always wait for them or similar to them to appear on the Pale Moon extension website, because that website was pretty much empty and now there are great stuff, even complete themes that looks great. FF is more bloated as days go by, it was a great browser today is just like another chrome. I mean, FF used to crash often for me, that’s gonne with Pale Moon. It actually uses more ram on my machine, having 50+ tabs with no performance issues fast startup. I’ve been running Pale Moon native 圆4 Build on my win 8.1 and I can say it’s the fastest web browser I have ever used.
All of you were wrong, 2 years, Pale Moon is alive, and with even a bigger user base. A lot of people calling Pale Moon project is going to die, that’s what you guys said 2 years ago Pale Moon is not going to survive any longer.
0 kommentar(er)
